Did anyone else notice this?
Two days ago McCain went on "Morning Joe" and told Joe Scarborough that "the fundamentals of this package are good, they're strong" regarding the new bailout plan. Later he went on to say,"now, we have to go about fixing the fundamental problems in our economy, and that’s going to be long and hard and tough."
It seems to me that if he was going to claim in September that by "fundamentals" he meant the American worker (insulting us by claiming this was obviously what he meant), then by his logic it's the American worker who is apparently propping up the economic package. And the American worker needs to be fixed. (I love that Palin used the old fundamentals=workers line in the debate as well.)
McCain's statement to Scarborough exposes once and for all what he truly meant when he said "the fundamentals of the economy are strong." Fundamentals=fundamentals, no matter which way he spins it, and no amount of semantic game-playing can alter that fact.
This is just another glaring example of McCain's propensity for lying in the face of challenges. I'd like to know how he's going to explain this one. Hey, I'm a fundamental--are you?
Saturday, October 4, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment